One fully loaded Australian engineer at $110,000 costs $123,200 a year with superannuation, which buys just over four offshore engineers through Pear Tree. For a four-person team that is $492,800 against $120,000, a saving of $372,800 a year, and on $1.2 million in the bank it turns fifteen months of runway into twenty-one. The constraint on ANZ tech hiring is no longer budget, it is that the local workforce is shrinking.
Because the local pipeline is going backwards. Australia's technology workforce was 967,000 people in 2025, a 0.3% decline and the first fall in the twelve years the Australian Computer Society has tracked it, and the country needs another 259,000 technology professionals by 2035 (ACS Digital Pulse 2026).
New Zealand has the same problem in a smaller market. About 132,000 people work in ICT professions supporting a tech sector worth roughly $24 billion, or 8% of GDP, with the top 200 exporters growing at around 8% a year, five times the rate of the wider economy. Meanwhile ICT visa approvals fell 67% year on year to 729 in 2024, and NCEA technology subject participation has declined about 2% a year since 2015 (Tech New Zealand, August 2026).
So demand compounds while supply contracts. 85% of Australian organisations and 87% of New Zealand employers already cannot find the skills they need (AU-01 and NZ-01), and 58% of ANZ companies plan to increase offshore headcount in 2026 (MKT-04). For a SaaS company the practical effect is that the roadmap is gated by hiring, not by ideas.
Between $2,080 and $3,200 a month per person all in, being the offshore salary plus a flat $400 per month management fee. A back-end developer is $2,640 a month and a front-end developer $2,360, against $95,000 to $130,000 and $85,000 to $120,000 respectively for the same roles in Australia.
Two things make the tech comparison sharper than in other sectors. Engineering salaries are high, so the absolute gap per head is large. And the management fee is flat, so it does not scale with seniority the way superannuation, payroll tax and a percentage agency margin all do.
Six extra months on a typical seed-stage balance sheet, which is usually worth more than the cash saving itself. Take a company with $1.2 million in the bank, $39,000 a month in non-engineering burn, and four engineers at $110,000 each. Fully loaded with 12% superannuation that engineering line is $41,067 a month and total burn is $80,067, giving fifteen months.
Swap two of those seats offshore and runway goes to 18.6 months. Swap three and it goes to 21.1 months, with the same four people building. That is the difference between raising from a position of traction and raising because you have to.
The same arithmetic runs the other way if you would rather buy capacity than time. The $41,067 a month that funds four local engineers funds one local plus twelve offshore, which is a different company. Most teams land somewhere in between, and the sensible version of that is the next section.
Keep architecture, on-call ownership and anything customer-facing at the executive level local; offshore the build, the test, the support and the design. The general rule is that decisions with long half-lives stay close, and execution scales offshore.
Two roles deserve a specific warning. Do not offshore your first engineer, because at that point the person is making architectural decisions the company lives with for years and you have no internal benchmark to review them against. And do not offshore primary on-call for a production system unless the time zone genuinely covers your incident window, which for a Manila-based engineer means your day and not your night.
The counterpart is that support scales offshore better than almost anything else in SaaS. A customer support professional is $1,700 a month all in against $50,000 to $65,000 locally, and the Philippines sits at UTC+8, zero to three hours from Australian eastern time (PH-07), so tickets are answered inside your business day rather than overnight.
No, provided the same controls apply to them as to anyone else. Neither framework says where a person must sit. ISO 27001:2022 Annex A control 6.7 covers remote working explicitly, requiring secure access methods, authentication, device protections such as screen locks and remote wipe, security awareness training, monitoring, and access revocation on termination.
An offshore team member on a managed device inside your VPN with named accounts and least-privilege access is easier to evidence in an audit than a local contractor emailing files from a personal laptop. What auditors look for is consistency: the same screening, the same training, the same asset register, the same offboarding.
This is where the engagement model matters commercially. Every Pear Tree placement is onboarded within one to two weeks with VPN, two-factor authentication and compliant cloud workflows (PT-08), and because the professional works directly for you inside your own systems, your evidence trail is your own rather than a third party's. 62% of businesses now require security certifications from their vendors (COM-06), and if you sell SaaS you already know that.
You do, if the assignment clause is drafted for the jurisdiction where the person actually works. This is the item that costs SaaS companies real money, and it does not surface until a technical due diligence during a raise or an acquisition, at which point a gap in the chain of title is expensive and slow to fix.
Get three things right. The engagement agreement must assign all intellectual property created in the course of the work, it must be governed by a law under which that assignment is enforceable, and the same clause must cover every contributor including anyone the person might subcontract to. The Philippines is a signatory to the major international IP treaties (IPOPHL and WIPO 2025, COM-07), which helps, but treaty membership is not a substitute for a properly drafted clause.
Keep the commit history clean too. Named accounts in your own repositories, no shared logins, and no code living on a personal machine. An acquirer's technical diligence will look at exactly that.
By picking the market to match the shift you actually need. The Philippines overlaps an Australian working day by six to eight hours on ordinary local hours, which suits live collaboration, pairing and standups. South Africa at UTC+2 covers the ANZ evening and overnight (SA-05), which is what you want for tier-one support triage, monitoring and overnight build or release work.
Pear Tree recruits from both markets (PT-10), with 1.82 million professionals in Philippine professional services (PH-04) and 270,000-plus in South Africa (SA-02), and is the only major offshore provider with a genuine New Zealand presence (PT-11). Well-managed offshore teams reach 90 to 95% of onshore productivity (McKinsey and Deloitte 2024, RET-05).
The operational discipline is the same discipline good remote engineering already needs: written handovers, decisions recorded in the tracker rather than in a call, and one named owner per workstream. Every role runs through a six-step process screening 200 to 400 applicants to shortlist three to five (PT-05), with a practical test in the actual stack.
For an ANZ SaaS company, offshore engineering is a runway decision before it is a cost decision: four local engineers or fifteen extra months, on the same balance sheet. Keep architecture and on-call ownership in-house, scale build, test, design and support offshore, hold the same security controls across everyone, and get the IP assignment drafted for the right jurisdiction before a diligence process finds the gap.
AUTHOR BIO: Nick is Co-Founder of Pear Tree, a direct offshore talent placement company helping Australian and New Zealand businesses hire world-class Filipino and South African professionals without the agency markup. With offices in Sydney, Auckland, Cebu, Manila, Cape Town and Hawke's Bay, Pear Tree has placed talent with 750+ companies and maintains a 90% retention rate.